Skip to main content

New Enlightenment Lecture (Edinburgh, November 2022)

On 18th November 2022, from 4pm to 5:30pm, I will deliver the New Enlightenment Lecture at the University of Edinburgh.

New Enlightenment Lectures are held annually, and feature a prominent woman philosopher leading a roundtable discussion with postgraduate students and faculty members on gender issues in Philosophy, and delivering a keynote lecture on a topic of her choice.

I am honoured I was invited to give a talk!

Here are the poster of the event and the abstract of my talk.


Poster for the New Enlightenment Lecture

Epistemic Criteria of Delusionality

Both in the popular press and in cognitive science research, there is a tendency not only to compare beliefs in conspiracy theories with clinical delusions, but to call ‘delusions’ various nonclinical beliefs that are found epistemically problematic, including conspiracy beliefs. One recent proposal by Sam Wilkinson is that when an interpreter calls a speaker’s belief delusional, the interpreter expresses their folk-epistemic disapproval towards the belief. Being an expression of disapproval, the term ‘delusion’ is not descriptive and the folk-epistemic disapproval signalled by its use cannot be further unpacked. In this talk, I embrace the idea that calling beliefs delusions is not a mere description, but I attempt to unpack the reasons for the disapproval that the term expresses. 

I argue that delusionality encompasses the belief’s features that make it epistemically undesirable or costly from the interpreter’s point of view. These features include (1) implausibility, in the sense that the belief does not have the appearance of truth; (2) unshakeability, in the sense that the belief is responsive to reasons but is not typically given up under the pressure of counterargument or counterevidence; and (3) centrality to the speaker’s identity, in the sense that the belief reflects a speaker’s explicit, stable, and emotionally laden commitment. This analysis can partially explain why, in order to abandon a delusional belief, a speaker needs to undergo something like a conversion.


Popular posts from this blog

Calendar of events in 2025

Here is a list of events in 2025, divided by academic talks, events for schools, and public engagement events. Talks and lectures 30 January: Agency and Justice in Mental Health (with Rose McCabe) at the Agency, Mental Health and Responsibility Conference , Uppsala, Sweden. 6 February: Epistemic Justice, Agency, and Youth Mental Health  (with Rose McCabe) at the PHaR  Being and Feeling Understood conference, Aston University, UK. 4 March: Spiritual or pathological? Resilient beliefs, agency and identity (with Aneela Khan) at the Women in Philosophy seminar, University of Birmingham, UK. 10-12 March: Is it a mistake to attribute responsibility or blame to people seeking support during a mental health crisis? (with Rose McCabe) at the  Big Mistake! Big! Huge!  Graduate Conference, University of Milan, Italy. 19 May: Are beliefs in conspiracy theories pathological? Seminario de Diversidad Cognitiva , Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico. 11-12 Jun...

Talks during study leave in 2024

Taking advantage of a concentrated period of research, I have planned a series of talks on my research on delusions, conspiracy beliefs, and epistemic injustice and a series of talks in or for schools. Academic talks Medical reasons to promote epistemically just communication in mental health clinical encounters. OZSW Conference , Eindhoven, 30-31 August 2024. Epistemically just medicine is good medicine. Bioethics and Social Justice , Prague, 12-13 September 2024. Conspiracy Beliefs and Delusions as Implausible and Unshakeable Identity Beliefs. Conspiracy Beliefs Between Secret Evidence and Delusion . Berlin, 26-27 September 2024. Are conspiracy theories epistemically innocent? Pre-talk with Egenis graduate students. Exeter, 30 September 2024. Medical reasons to promote epistemically just interactions in healthcare. Egenis seminar . Exeter, 30 September 2024. Epistemically just interactions are good medicine. PhenoLab . Online, 1 October 2024. Speaker and panel member at the Annual Me...

Developments at The Philosophy Garden

The resources available at The Philosophy Garden have significantly expanded in recent months, thanks to the generous support of the University of Birmingham AHRC Impact Acceleration Account. In particular, new videos address issues surrounding disagreement and the difficulty and importance of trusting reliable sources and being socially connected in order to gain the information we need and achieve our most basic goals. These videos can be conversation starters, prompting reflection and discussion, and introducing some interesting concepts in concrete and engaging ways. We have been using them with primary school children, from age 7, and with secondary school students and sixth-formers as well. We use them in class with our undergraduate and Masters students to test intuitions and contextualise problems.  On the site, there are recommendations for readings, games young people can play online to challenge themselves, a video library, and handouts, worksheets, and slides for teach...